Arttysur Lux Village
Thirty-six hotel-apartments in the ski station for 2028, sold with the operator unnamed — and the same sixty-day ceiling, on units that are apartments rather than rooms.
The third project in one ski station with the same skeleton, and the only one whose units are apartments. Grupo Arttysur's brochure calls Lux Village “a luxury eco-resort of 36 hotel-apartments”, Phase 1 of houses sold out, Phase 2 completing in the second quarter of 2028. Owners “transfer operational use to a single hotel operator”; owner use is capped at 60 days a year; the revenue split is given as roughly sixty to the owner and forty to the operator, with the operator paying utilities, taxes, staff, maintenance and mandatory insurance and the owner paying building insurance and the IBI.
Sixty days again, which is the Andalusian ceiling and not a coincidence. Article 42.3 of Ley 13/2011 makes owner use above two months a year a prohibited residential use, and every Andalusian product of this kind lands at or just under it. That the cap recurs across three unrelated projects in one resort is the clearest evidence the register has that the terms are drawn by the statute rather than by the developer. What differs here is the unit: apartments with their own inventory rather than the hotel's own rooms, which makes this a sale of homes operated as a hotel rather than a sale of hotel rooms.
The operator is not named, in a project priced at six and eight hundred thousand euros plus VAT. Nor is an architect, nor the municipality — the sources say only “Sierra Nevada, Granada”. And the agent's own page contradicts itself on price: a table reading “Prices from €600,000” and an available unit at €600,000, against body text giving “650.000€ + VAT” for a two-bedroom and “800.000€ + VAT” for a three-bedroom duplex. One speaker, two sets of figures, and the register prints both.
Every source here is at one remove from the developer. The brochure is the developer's own document, hosted on the selling agent's server; the listing is the agent's. No Grupo Arttysur site and no municipal or planning document was reached. The register records the developer's words and says whose server they were read from.
Not for a buyer who needs to know who will run their asset: the operator is unnamed in a project selling above six hundred thousand euros. Not for anyone expecting a home — owner use is capped at two months by law.
Who it is not for
Not for a buyer who needs to know who will run their asset: the operator is unnamed in a project selling above six hundred thousand euros. Not for anyone expecting a home — owner use is capped at two months by law.
Sources
- lucasfox.com (the selling agent's development page, named as such: “a luxury eco-resort of 36 hotel-apartments”; “The owner will be able to use the property for 60 days a year”; a table reading “Prices from €600,000” against body text giving “650.000€ + VAT” and “800.000€ + VAT”, which the register records as an internal contradiction in one source; completion in the second quarter of 2028; the location given only as “Sierra Nevada, Granada” — https://www.lucasfox.com/new-development/arttysurluxvillage.html
- lucasfox.com (the DEVELOPER's own brochure, hosted on the agent's server: “PROMOTION FOR SALE”; developer “Grupo Arttysur”; owners “transfer operational use to a single hotel operator”; a revenue split of roughly 60/40 to owner and operator, the operator paying utilities, taxes, staff, maintenance and mandatory insurance and the owner paying building insurance and the IBI; the project called an “APARTMENT HOTEL”; Phase 1 of houses sold out — https://resources.lucasfox.com/development/arttysurluxvillage-brochure.pdf
- boe.es (Ley 13/2011 art. 42.3, the two-month ceiling on owner use that the 60-day cap sits beneath — https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2012-876)
Pages read are linked.
Verification
- Official source
- Checked
- Inventory
- From official source
- Property confirmation
- Pending
- Last verified
- —
Booking
Private Residences records addresses; it does not broker them. Enquiries are passed to the party named in the record, and nothing on this site is an offer.
Make an enquiryClassified by The Resort Collection House · Edition 2026 · PR-D-512
In the journal
And it is not one scheme but three, in one square. Three hundred metres away, Meliá Sol y Nieve is owned by an entity registered as Comunidad de Propietarios de Habitaciones del Hotel Sol y Nieve de Monachil — a community of owners of the rooms, 206 of them. Arttysur Lux Village sells thirty-six hotel-apartments for 2028 under the same sixty-day ceiling. Two unrelated projects landing on exactly sixty is how the register found the statute.
A month ago the atlas named six places that would enter «on their own terms if proposed», and gave the grounds so the proposal would be cheap. Writing them meant checking those grounds for the first time. One stood. Brimstone Hill was never impregnable — it fell; English Harbour's dockyard was decommissioned in 1889 and reopened in 1961, so continuously is false, and Portsmouth fails the uniqueness claim separately; the Hamilton birthplace house in Charlestown is a 1983 reconstruction; the last Kalinago territory is wrong where the only reserved is checkable. A claim offered to save somebody else work is still a claim.
Investment migration — the facts the rule turns on
The rule for Spain: Closed to property — checked 24.09.2026.
The register publishes the facts and the rule; it does not say whether any purchase qualifies. Eligibility attaches to a sale, not to a building, and the register is not immigration counsel.